landstander
21-08-2004, 09:49
In section 4 (Adjectives vs. adverbs) of this article (http://tdl.diabloii.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=27&page=1), the author has completely reversed the correct rules as far as 'feel' is concerned.
"I feel ____" can be properly used with many different modifiers. Some examples:
I feel sick (adjective). -- means I don't feel healthy
I feel well (adjective). -- means the opposite of the above
*I feel well (adverb). -- means I am particularly good at feeling
*I feel badly (adverb). -- means I am not very good at feeling
I feel bad (adjective). -- similar to 'I feel sick,' but more general
I feel good (adjective). -- similar to 'I feel well,' but more general
I feel oranges (noun). -- means I am currently fondling citrus fruit
Note the bizarre meanings of the two marked examples. Though it's possible someone might want to say such a thing, it's very unlikely.
The rest of the article was very good, which made this glaring error even more noticeable. It would be a shame if this mistake became even more wide-spread than it already is.
I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to post this, but I couldn't find a link for comments on the article page, nor could I find any way to identify the author.
"I feel ____" can be properly used with many different modifiers. Some examples:
I feel sick (adjective). -- means I don't feel healthy
I feel well (adjective). -- means the opposite of the above
*I feel well (adverb). -- means I am particularly good at feeling
*I feel badly (adverb). -- means I am not very good at feeling
I feel bad (adjective). -- similar to 'I feel sick,' but more general
I feel good (adjective). -- similar to 'I feel well,' but more general
I feel oranges (noun). -- means I am currently fondling citrus fruit
Note the bizarre meanings of the two marked examples. Though it's possible someone might want to say such a thing, it's very unlikely.
The rest of the article was very good, which made this glaring error even more noticeable. It would be a shame if this mistake became even more wide-spread than it already is.
I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to post this, but I couldn't find a link for comments on the article page, nor could I find any way to identify the author.