hope D3 is 3D....but

[king of noobs]

but the pvp mode would be just like wow(i think)......except with bunch of 8 frame teleing and denych charging...its going to be pretty hard to aim and attack someone

[In the name of Zod]

Shouldn't be any harder fighting monsters. That's if its 3rd person at course. :laughing:

[chelate]

I too hope it is, but I don't see how there would be any problems aiming. Look at any 3d over-the-shoulder game, like Hellgate.

[MrCanon]

You want it to be third-person instead of isometric view ?

Why ?

[aishilee]

wao. hellgate london was pretty bad i felt.

aiming the head of the monster recieve same damage as everywhere of the mob.
they used the same game style like d2 / map changes / limited no. of players in map/ .. so on ..

[Me2NiK]

I don't want it 3D. Not even a little bit. Then it's not Diablo, it's Hellgate. I would much rather prefer it stay isometric.

[CarsV]

I don't want it 3D. Not even a little bit. Then it's not Diablo, it's Hellgate. I would much rather prefer it stay isometric.

Then continue playing D2. Make D3 3D and get with the times, and maintain the helicopter view.

[minizx]

wao. hellgate london was pretty bad i felt.

aiming the head of the monster recieve same damage as everywhere of the mob.
they used the same game style like d2 / map changes / limited no. of players in map/ .. so on ..

in my opinion hgl was one of the most dissapointing games ive ever played even when i was in beta every one kept telling each other its only beta but when hgl was relesed it was oh they have to patch it for the good stuff
on paper it sounded great but an fps game needs vary different textures and zones so even though the maps were randomised 90% of the maps just looked like the same old tunnel or the same old park and dont get me started on skills "loot" or the fact that it was £30 of my hard earned cash down the pan :undecided:

[Me2NiK]

Then continue playing D2. Make D3 3D and get with the times, and maintain the helicopter view.
Get with the times? Games are still being released in isometric perspective. It's not an issue of modernization, it's an issue of gameplay. Perspective changes a lot more than just graphics; a third-person perspective does not suit Diablo-esque gameplay. Blizzard's not stupid enough to release a Diablo game with a WoW perspective.

[Master Zap]

I hope D2 stays in 2d like the first two. I'm all for improving the in game graphics, allowing more customization of equipped items and such. The game play in terms of action and the slash and hack feel cannot be implemented in the real time that exists in the d2 world in 3d imo.

[trashX]

a three dimensional world is fine, just no first person perspective

[raishi]

switching to 3d doesn't really mean that much of a change...just as long as they don't try to make it a draatic change...making a 2d square a 3d square just means a couple more lines...but nothing else has realyl changed...unless the artist wants it to change...

[trashX]

it would be pretty cool to be able to slightly zoom in and out and turn your view

[rawrawr]

hope it remains like the current d2 gameplay

[PoiZonCraZy]

To me it's not about view, or 3D-2D that make Diablo what it is. It's about the speed of the game. Diablo is fast-paced. As long as it's a fast paced hack-n-slash game, I wouldn't mind if it's 3D isometric or 3rd person view, 2D or 3D etc.

[Omikron8]

Then continue playing D2. Make D3 3D and get with the times, and maintain the helicopter view.

new is not necessarily better